As the Sydney residential property market closed for Christmas last year, the question on many selling agents’ lips was whether or not the so called party, especially over $1 million, would continue in the New Year.
When that market opened six or so weeks later, mainstream media and many selling agents in their self serving weekly blurbs leapt on escalating auction clearance rates, hordes of so called Chinese buyers hoovering up prestige property and the smashing of sometimes artificially low reserve prices to proclaim the status quo maintained.
Hardly surprising therefore, that Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) data released during this period revealed that the net percentage of those expecting house prices to rise was at its highest level since September 2009.
The truth behind the scenes and beneath the hype is that many of the same agents, realising that those clearance rates are more a function of tight supply than wallets suddenly opening, were and still are quietly muttering amongst themselves that “this could be as good as it gets”.
While there were undoubtedly some strong individual results, there were also many sellers who suffered capital losses or derived meagre gains particularly where they had bought their properties in the last half of 2007 or first quarter of 2008.
Not much talk about those folks in all the hype.
And for a compelling busting of the xenophobic myth about those so called “Chinese buyers”, the entertaining article by Bernard Keane in the 10 March 2014 edition of Crikey entitled “Chinese real estate invasion? Not according to the data fellas” is worth reading.
If what follows is any indication, then and consistent with what this article has been saying over the last quarter of 2013, those agents with their quiet mutterings may well be right:
Why?
In that six week hiatus:
For confirmation that all is not as it might seem in mainstream media, graphs presented in the address mentioned above by CBA and Charter Hall showed a bizarrely positive correlation between, on the one hand, peoples’ expectations that house prices will rise and on the other hand, increased rates of savings, the slowest rate of credit growth in 23 years and increasing fears about job security.
Our take on all this
To assess whether or not the positive expectation that house prices would rise was prevailing over those negative indicators and expectations, we analysed housing sales data compiled by APM between $1 – $1.5 million and above $1.5 million across six Sydney regions over the three winter months prior to 8 October 2013 and compared it to the five and typically, headier spring/summer months between 9 October 2013 and 11 March 2014. To be conservative, we reduced the latter period by six weeks to allow for the shut down between Christmas and the New Year.
The data
# Months | City/East | Inner West | Lower NS | Upper NS | Nth Beaches | South | |
8 July 2013 – 8 October 2013 | |||||||
< $1.5 million | 328 | 322 | 294 | 328 | 326 | 270 | |
Properties per month | 3 | 109.3 | 107.3 | 98.0 | 109.3 | 108.7 | 90.0 |
> $1.5 million | 467 | 202 | 324 | 289 | 196 | 81 | |
Properties per month | 3 | 155.7 | 67.3 | 108.0 | 96.3 | 65.3 | 27.0 |
9 October 2013 – 11 March 2014 | |||||||
< $1.5 million | 319 | 323 | 358 | 315 | 319 | 269 | |
Properties per month | 3.5 | 91.1 | 92.3 | 102.3 | 90.0 | 91.1 | 76.9 |
> $1.5 million | 393 | 316 | 395 | 392 | 261 | 147 | |
Properties per month | 3.5 | 112.3 | 90.3 | 112.9 | 112.0 | 74.6 | 42.0 |
Graphs of that data
Analysis and predictions
Over the two periods:
Conclusion
Do superlatives such as ‘surging’, ‘booming’ and ‘on fire’ accurately describe top end trends in Sydney’s residential property market?
‘ … Not according to the data fellas’